Reality of Lending

Our economy is struggling. We all know that. But understanding why, what happened, and how the banking industry and the government is responding can be complicated and timely. The Colorado Bankers Association recently released information about the "lack of lending” in order to encourage the appropriate coverage of the issues surrounding this frustrating topic.

They have released a brochure titled, The Reality of Lending that details what they believe to be reasons for the current "credit crunch". Below is some of the highlights of the facts they are hoping are addressed.

Banking takes appropriate responsibility for its prudent loan standards. We also think customers and the public deserve to understand other factors that significantly impact the ability to get credit in this environment.

The lack of lending (heavily criticized by the public, media, and public officials) reflects low loan demand and is attributable to borrower creditworthiness issues, lender financial constraints, and regulators’ tougher standards, and is exacerbated by the greatly diminished role of nonbank lenders recently. For business borrowers who are key to an economic recovery and already have financial strain this means banks are their primary source of credit and banks are unable to make many of the loans for the reasons stated. This is especially difficult for loans secured by real estate.

Changing regulatory standards in capital requirements, loan concentrations, and loan downgrades often result from subjective judgments and national benchmarks. They disallow recovery of real estate values over time, and often prompt shrinkage of the bank which reduces lending and greatly impacts customers.

Bank lending plays a critical role in our economic recovery. Borrowers and lenders are addressing financial constraints and are working through issues. Bank regulation and examination are essential to a sound banking system. CBA recognizes this essential role but also believes regulators are impairing bank lending and thus the recovery by overly aggressive actions in capital standards, concentration standards, and loan downgrades. CBA is providing essential information to bankers, public officials, the public, and major customer groups.

The site titled Financial Information for Consumers has additional information on this and other topics such as Home Mortgages, Identity Theft, Credit Awareness and Loans.

Related party basis shifting case upheld

A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to affirm a previous Tax Court ruling further highlights the need for extra scrutiny in 1031 exchanges involving related parties. The 2005 Tax Court decision, involving exchanges of condominium and apartment properties (Teruya Brothers), disallowed the tax deferred swap because it occurred between related parties and the main reason for the exchanges was to reduce the overall tax bills of the buyer and seller.

In the case, the entity (Teruya Bros, Ltd) that owned the apartment building and condominium complex had a built in, large capital gain. Upon the sale, a $13 million capital gain would have resulted to this entity triggering a massive tax bill. Rather than sell, the entity transferred the real estate to an unrelated Qualified Intermediary (QI) which sold the properties and bought replacement land from a subsidiary (Times) in which the entity had a controlling interest.

The issue that causes this related party exchange to be disallowed essentially relates to the overall tax paid. The subsidiary did not exchange into additional replacement property. Rather, it chose to treat the sales as taxable events and accounted for a capital gain of roughly $3.5 M on the property sale to the related entity. However, the subsidiary that sold the property had significant net operating losses from previous operations. These NOLs were used to offset the $3.5 million gain - resulting in no taxes paid on the sales.

Effectively, what the related party exchange attempted was a "cash out". The subsidiary now had the cash from the sales. The two related entities combined had decreased their investment in real property by approximately $13.4 million while increasing their cash position by the same amount. By disallowing the related parties to cash out of a significant investment in real property under the appearance of a 1031 like kind exchange, the Appeals Court upheld the previous Tax Court decision that "these transactions were undoubtedly structured in contravention...that nonrecognition treatment only apply to transactions "where a taxpayer can be viewed as merely continuing his investment.""

It is clear that tax deferred exchanges between related parties are subject to additional scrutiny. Accounting professionals, tax and real estate attorneys and taxpayers should be familiar with, and aware of the potential pitfalls, in exchanging property between related parties. The use of a Qualified Intermediary familiar with the rules and legal precedence in dealing with this advanced topic can be of assistance in handling a related party exchange appropriately.

Qualified Escrow Agreements for Intermediaries

A number of states have instituted regulation for the Qualified Intermediary industry. Nevada, Idaho, California, Colorado, Washington, Maine and Oregon have all passed legislation. A number of other states are looking at adding some law(s) to protect taxpayers in the face of 1031 exchange facilitator fraud and losses.

Existing state law in California, Colorado and Washington as well as upcoming 1031 laws in Maine (went into effect Sept 12, 2009) and Oregon (effective January 1, 2010) require Qualified Intermediaries to:

a) Maintain fidelity bond (typically not less than $1 M), or;

b) Post deposits of cash or letters of credit equal to the amount of the fidelity bond required, or;

c) Hold all client funds in Qualified Escrow or Qualified Trust accounts which require the signatures of both the QI & taxpayer to authorize any disbursements.

As a result of the aforementioned industry losses - and the subsequent insurance claims - many Qualified Intermediaries have recently been unable to obtain option a) - a fidelity bond. If you are looking at doing an exchange, you should ask your exchange provider to provide a copy of the Fidelity Bond Evidence of Insurance to ensure your Intemediary is complying with the fidelity bond requirement. Make sure, if you are acting as a Qualified Intermediary, you are in compliance with these laws!

If your 1031 exchange provider does not have bonding, they must either post cash or a letter of credit with the state or use a Qualified Escrow account. Qualified Escrow accounts are held at a third party escrow agency and provide the greatest level of protection against fraud or missing funds. The escrow agent will only invest the proceeds according to the Agreement. They will also require signatures of both the Qualified Intermediary and the taxpayer client before any movement of those funds takes place.

If you are considering completing a 1031 exchange (or are a Qualified Intermediary without bonding) and in need of establishing a Qualified Escrow, FirstBank Escrow Services and their escrow officers can provide a Qualified Escrow Agreement that is specific to the 1031 exchange. Along with protecting the integrity of your exchange, FirstBank’s team of escrow specialists can work with you to establish an escrow contract that simplifies your risk mitigation requirements and meets your transaction needs. Client escrow accounts are individually segregated and held securely in FDIC-insured deposit accounts. FirstBank Escrow Services provides rapid review and turnaround of the agreement to ensure your transaction closes quickly.

If you or your Qualified Intermediary have need for a Qualified Escrow, please contact one of FirstBank's escrow officers for additional information at 800-964-3444.

Negative Equity Mortgages and Reverse Exchanges

A recent WSJ report indicates that more than 32% of all mortgaged properties in the United States were in negative or near equity position as of June 30,2009. An additional 2.5 million mortgaged properties were approaching negative equity.

The five states with the largest negative equity share accounted for nearly half the nation's remaining states. Nevada, Arizona and and Florida had the largest number of negative equity mortgages. California and Michigan were the other top-ranked states for negative equity loans.

Negative equity - also known as "underwater" or "upside down" - means the borrower owes more on a mortgage than the home is worth. Near negative equity is when mortgages are within 5 percent of being in a negative equity position. Negative equity can occur because of a decline in value, an increase in mortgage debt or a combination of both.

While negative equity continues to be the dominant driver of the mortgage market because it leads to foreclosures, the good news is it actually declined slightly this quarter. Other recent news indicates home price declines are moderating or flattening - possibly indicating we are at the low point in the cycle. Of course, continued bad news in unemployment figures, a worsening commercial real estate market and cold weather seasonality could lead to further declines.

We've noticed a a couple of interesting trends in this negative equity market. It appears a growing number of our long-term, real estate investor clients feel it is the right time to get back in the real estate market and make additional purchases. The trouble they are now finding is that many of the lender-owned properties are receiving multiple offers or it is taking some time to get closed. The other interesting observation is that it still seems somewhat difficult to obtain financing. We've had a number of exchanges that weren't completed because lenders were unwilling or unable to lend on replacement property.

If you are considering buying, and find that perfect property, it may not be wise to wait until your sale occurs. This is where a reverse exchange may make sense. By having your replacement property already lined up and financed, your exchange will not fail because you were continually getting outbid in what appears to be a fabulous opportunity or because of an inability to obtain timely financing. For more information on the benefits of a reverse exchange and how 1031 Corporation, as a bank-owned QI, is uniquely positioned to assist with your reverse exchange, please give us a call at 888-367-1031.