Transferable Development Rights are 1031 Like Kind to Real Estate

Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) are a relatively modern land use planning tool that are encountered in many jurisdictions. Where they are authorized, governments can grant TDRs in order to limit or to entirely prevent development in special zoning districts. When properly structured, governments can accomplish these land use goals without having to pay for what might otherwise constitute costly partial – or even total – condemnations. TDR programs can also be used to reduce political and legal opposition to a restrictive zoning plan. In a TDR program, a governmental entity grants owners of property in the special use zone TDRs in exchange for either voluntary or compulsory new restrictions on the development of property within the zone. These TDRs can be sold on the open market to owners of other real property in a receiving zone, permitting development of the property in the receiving zone beyond what would otherwise have been permitted.

In a recent IRS Letter Ruling (2008-05012), a taxpayer proposed to sell a fee interest in relinquished property and use the proceeds to acquire TDRs. Those TDRs would be used to enhance construction on property the taxpayer already owned within a designated receiving zone. The taxpayer sought a ruling that the TDRs were like-kind to a fee interest in real property.

The IRS ruled that the TDRs could be like-kind to a fee interest under section 1031, despite the fact that the taxpayer intended to use the them to enhance real property it already owned, as long as the TDRs were acquired in an arm’s length transaction. They cited a prior Revenue Ruling from 1968 that said a leasehold with more than 30 years left to run on the property the taxpayer already owned was like-kind to a fee interest under section 1031 as long as the taxpayer acquired the leasehold in an arm’s length transaction.

Next, relying almost entirely on their classification under state and local law, the ruling held that the TDRs are like-kind to a fee interest in real property. While TDRs may not be treated identically to real property for all purposes, they are treated like real property in a number of important ways including: a) the fact that their grant is not discretionary; b) they appear to be permanent; c) they are transferred in a manner similar to the transfer of a deed or an easement; and d) they are recorded and indexed against the granting and receiving sites. Further, the state where the taxpayer was located had a tax statute and transfer tax provisions that seemed to define TDRs as real estate.

Because TDR programs vary considerably from one state to another, it is by no means certain that the laws of a particular jurisdiction will comply sufficiently with the standards presented in this letter ruling. As is always the case with private letter rulings, the ruling itself cannot be cited as precedent, and the IRS has the right to rule differently on subsequent occasions. However, the ruling is useful for the purpose of demonstrating the current thinking on this important subject. To receive a copy of the PLR involving TDRs, give us a call at 888-367-1031 or send us a message at 1031@1031cpas.com.

Family Limited Partnerships

In managing federal estate taxes, the use of Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) has proven to be a beneficial planning technique. During the last two decades, FLPs gained popularity. They also attracted the attention of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Due to the FLPs extraordinary tax benefits, the IRS has audited many FLPs. But this IRS challenge should not be viewed as their demise. Rather, IRS audits reveal proper FLP use and maintenance.

Benefits of the FLP
An FLP is a powerful estate planning tool that can help reduce future taxes. This tool may be very handy as estate taxes may soon be at an all time historic high. For those who pass away after 2010, the tax law would impose a steep estate tax or "death tax" burden of up to 55% of ranch value!

Using an FLP can help ease this tax burden. Through an FLP, a senior family member can reduce the estate tax and keep control of the family operation.

An FLP is often formed by a member of the senior generation who transfers family assets to the partnership in exchange for both general and limited partnership interests. Some or all of the limited partnership interests are then gifted to the junior generation. The general partner need not own a majority of the partnership interests. In fact, the general partner can own only 1 or 2% of the partnership, with the remaining interests owned by the limited partners.

This structure produces several advantages:

The senior family member can gift limited partnership interests to junior family members at less than the full fair market value of the underlying assets.

The use of the partnership entity allows a senior family member to shift some of the form and ranch income and future appreciation to other members of the family.

The senior family member retains management and control while transferring away limited ownership interests.

The senior family member can also place restrictions within the partnership agreement that ensure continuous family ownership.

At death, the senior family member's estate tax bill may be reduced since only the value of the decedent's partnership interest will be taxed.

IRS Scrutiny: Potential Concerns with the FLP
The IRS has taken a more aggressive stance regarding FLPs. Over the past several years, the IRS has had success in attacking FLPs with the most common problems being:

Failure to Follow Formalities. FLPs are required to have Partnership Agreements that must be followed. Although FLPs have far fewer formalities than corporations, the partners should have regular meetings, take minutes, and treat the entity with the formality expected of a non-family business.

Inadequate Valuation Reports. The IRS is often critical of both the quality and content of the family's valuation appraisals. To avoid the IRS attention, the family should retain accredited appraisers experienced with the requirements of estate tax appraisals.

Non-business Assets or Activities. FLPs are business entities and are not meant for personal use. The family homestead should not be placed into an FLP, nor should normal family expenses (utilities, clothing, educational expenses, etc.) be paid from the FLP.

Other "red flags" include commingling FLP and personal income, preparing FLP financial records after death and forming "deathbed" FLPs.

FLPs need annual care and regular maintenance. With this care, FLPs can achieve substantial federal estate and gift tax savings. For farm and ranch families with large illiquid estates, FLPs can be a very beneficial tax savings tool.

Denise Hoffman is a senior associate with the law firm Rothgerber Johnson and Lyons LLP. If you or your family has questions concerning Family Limited Partnerships, please call Denise at 303-628-9523 or contact her by e-mail at dhoffman@rothgerber.com.

Depreciation using Cost Segregation

The following information was graciously provided by Jeff Pinkerton of U.S. Cost Segregation.

You may be able to easily take cash out of the investment properties you currently own. It's actually quite easy.

You're probably depreciating those properties at 27.5 years (if residential) or 39 years (if commercial). There is a section of the IRS code that allows you to depreciate certain assets within that building at 15 or 7 or even 5 years. That faster depreciation means more of a tax writeoff which means less taxes. You can even go back in time and recapture this 'lost' depreciation that you haven't been taking.

The technique is called cost segregation analysis and has been a part of the tax law for the past decade. This analysis needs to be performed by a qualified engineering firm, which identifies and "costs out" those assets which qualify for faster depreciation. For example, carpet, electrical for computer equipment and decorative elements can be depreciated over 5 years. Site utilities, paving and landscaping can be depreciated over 15 years.

Imagine you purchased a 15 year old four-plex five years ago and paid $500,000 for it. Assume 20% of that went to land, that means you are depreciating $400,000 over 27.5 years (that's 3.6% per year). But of that $400,000 you paid for the building itself, how much went to the carpet? To the plumbing and kitchen fixtures? To the interior non-load bearing walls?

The answer, of course, is "I don't know". Cost segregation analysis answers those questions and provides data your CPA can use to apply the deductions you've been missing. Extra deductions means less taxes. In fact, it's common that 25% of the assets in an apartment can be depreciated more rapidly. Compare that with the 3.6% you're depreciating now and you can see how this technique can benefit you.

Further, leasehold improvements have even a more profound impact. Typically about 50% of those assets are amenable to accelerated depreciation. This means that you can write off the cost of the original carpet that came with the building, as well as the new carpet you installed. Similarly the new cabinets, the new bathroom and the new electrical wiring and so forth.

This is a time-tested and IRS-accepted method of helping improve your cash flow.

For more information, contact Jeff at 303.694.3924 or visit their website at U.S. Cost Segregation Services.