Estate Tax 2010

Many older taxpayers work to move wealth they've generated in their lifetimes from one generation to another while minimizing tax liability through estate planning. Intergenerational transfers of wealth have a significant impact on the economy and many believe that the estate tax generates costs to taxpayers, the economy and the environment that far exceed any potential benefits that it might arguably produce. Still, the political landscape today seems to indicate estate taxes are here to stay.

When dealing with estate planning, many older generation taxpayers deed property into a family partnership or LLC. Children receive an ownership percentage "gift" each year that transfers ownership over time. The parents that have acquired the real estate are able to continue to take income from the property but their heirs receive the property without estate tax (up to $1 million in lifetime gift tax exemption). If property is sold, the LLC can utilize a 1031 exchange to sell the investment property and allow the real estate portfolio to grow tax deferred. When the parents pass on, the children then have an ownership in the investment property outside the estate.

If there is not time to do this advance planning, the heirs are subject to an estate tax. This tax had been getting less concerning for many taxpayers due to the Bush tax cuts in 2001 that increased the exemption amount and reduced the tax rate. The tax was set to expire in 2010. It was expected that Congress would re-visit the estate tax before the end of 2009 and put some structure in place. They did not. Because of a limited time circumstance confusion reigns in the current estate tax landscape.

Both the estate tax and the generation-skipping transfer tax (on assets given to grandchildren) were repealed at the end of 2009. If Congress and the President do nothing, both taxes are scheduled to return in 2011 at the unfavorable rates that applied in 2001. The amount that is exempt from each of these taxes will then be $1 million and the tax on the rest will be 55%. Most tax writers do not want this to happen and talks on the estate tax are already underway.

Congress is talking about reinstating the estate tax retroactively to January 1st, 2010 and reviving the "date of death" value for inherited assets. Given the size of some estates, like the one of billionaire Dan Duncan, some are likely to challenge the retroactive imposition of the estate tax and there is a long shot that a proposal gaining ground may give estate a choice in 2010. However, there are past court cases that suggest restoring the tax this way is perfectly legal and could be upheld. Of course, the sooner Congress acts, the fewer number of large estates likely to bring such cases and the less chance these heirs will have to call the tax unconstitutional.

Members of the House of Representatives generally support a proposed $3.5 million exemption and a 45% rate on estates. There is growing support in the Senate for a $5.0 million exemption and a 35% top tax rate. We'll see, in the coming weeks and months, how this plays out and we'll certainly do our best to keep you posted of any news.

By conferring with your tax professional, and utilizing the tools of estate planning and 1031 exchanges together, one can minimize the effects of capital gains taxes on investment property. If you have are considering selling your investment property and want to defer capital gains tax using the tools of a 1031 exchange, please contact the professionals at 1031 Corporation. We have years of experience and work with accounting professionals to structure an exchange to minimize the tax impact on your investment assets. Give us a call today at 888-367-1031.